gws-gmail-reply-all

Gmail: Reply-all to a message (handles threading automatically).

Quality

73%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

Securityby

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./skills/gws-gmail-reply-all/SKILL.md

Quality

Content

86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is a lean, highly actionable reference with executable commands, a complete flags table, and well-organized sections. The only gap is the absence of an explicit verify-before-send workflow recommendation despite the available --dry-run flag.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence (no padding about what Gmail or reply-all is); the only minor trim is light overlap between the Tips bullets and the Flags table descriptions, keeping it just below fully lean.	4 / 5
Actionability	Fully executable, copy-paste-ready commands with a concrete usage line and six examples covering the common cases (basic reply, --remove, --cc, --html, attachment, --draft), plus a complete flags table.	5 / 5
Workflow Clarity	The single action is unambiguous (clear usage line and examples) and --dry-run/--draft safety flags exist, but there is no explicit recommended verify-before-send sequence, so it sits below the explicit-validation anchor.	4 / 5
Progressive Disclosure	Well-organized into clear sections (Usage, Flags, Examples, Tips, See Also) with clearly signaled one-level-deep navigation to sibling skills, and the self-contained content is appropriately sized for a single-file skill with no bundle files needed.	5 / 5
	Total	18 / 20 Passed

Description

61%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is concise and names a concrete, distinct action with natural trigger terms, but it omits an explicit "Use when..." clause, leaving the "when" only weakly implied and capping completeness. Adding trigger guidance and a synonym or two would meaningfully raise the score.

Suggestions

Add an explicit "Use when..." clause, e.g. "Use when the user asks to reply to all recipients of a Gmail thread," to raise completeness above 3.

Include natural synonyms such as "email" or "respond to everyone" alongside "Reply-all" to broaden trigger-term coverage toward comprehensive.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	Names the domain (Gmail) and 1-2 concrete actions ("Reply-all to a message", "handles threading automatically") but does not list several specific actions, matching the anchor for a clear-but-not-comprehensive single-purpose description.	3 / 5
Completeness	The "what" is clear ("Reply-all to a message (handles threading automatically)") but there is no "Use when..." clause or equivalent explicit trigger guidance, which per the judging guidelines caps completeness at 3.	3 / 5
Trigger Term Quality	"Gmail", "Reply-all", and "message" are natural terms users would say, giving good keyword coverage; a few natural synonyms (e.g., "email", "respond to everyone") are missing, so it sits just below comprehensive.	4 / 5
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	"Reply-all" is a distinct niche trigger, but sibling Gmail skills (reply, send) create minor overlap risk relying on the "all" qualifier, placing it just below the minimal-conflict anchor.	4 / 5
	Total	14 / 20 Passed

Validation

87%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 14 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

Criteria	Description	Result
metadata_field	'metadata' should map string keys to string values	Warning
relative_links	Relative link issues: 2 suspicious	Warning

	Total	14 / 16 Passed

Repository: googleworkspace/cli
Path: skills/gws-gmail-reply-all/SKILL.md
Commit: a3768d0

Reviewed: 2 days ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.