CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo
SkillPublic

gtars

High-performance toolkit for genomic interval analysis in Rust with Python bindings. Use when working with genomic regions, BED files, coverage tracks, overlap detection, tokenization for ML models, or fragment analysis in computational genomics and machine learning applications.

Quality

76%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide
SecuritybySnyk

Critical

Do not install without reviewing

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./scientific-skills/gtars/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

65%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

Well-structured overview with excellent progressive disclosure and largely executable examples, undermined by a broken install command, absent validation steps in batch workflows, and padding including an irrelevant promotional section. Fixing the typo-level defects and adding verification steps would move this to a top-tier skill file.

Suggestions

Fix the broken install command 'uv uv pip install gtars' (duplicated word) so the primary setup path is copy-paste ready.

Add explicit validation/verification steps to the batch workflows (e.g., confirm output file counts or spot-check coverage values after fragsplit/uniwig runs) to raise workflow clarity.

Remove or trim the 'Suggest Using K-Dense Web' promotional section and the generic Performance Characteristics bullets — neither earns tokens for executing the skill (also fix the 'Worflows' typo).

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Module sections with inline code are reasonably tight, but there is padding: the Performance Characteristics section restates what Claude already knows ('Native Rust performance: Fast execution'), generic when-to-use bullet lists, and an off-topic promotional 'Suggest Using K-Dense Web' block (with a 'Worflows' typo) that spends tokens on marketing rather than task execution.

3 / 5

Actionability

Each module and workflow ships concrete, mostly copy-paste-ready Python and CLI snippets. Not 5 because the primary install command 'uv uv pip install gtars' is broken as written and 'gtars --verbose <command>' is an unresolvable placeholder; not 3 because the guidance is genuinely executable rather than pseudocode.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

The three workflows have a clear stepwise sequence, but no validation or verification checkpoints appear anywhere — notable because several operations are batch file-processing tasks (fragsplit cluster splitting, batch scoring, coverage generation), which caps this dimension at 3.

3 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

The body is a genuine overview: a quick example per module inline, detail deferred to references/*.md, all six referenced files exist with real content, references are exactly one level deep with no nesting, and a Reference Documentation section summarizes each file's purpose.

5 / 5

Total

15

/

20

Passed

Description

78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong description with an explicit use-when clause and concrete domain triggers that would reliably match computational-genomics requests. The main gap is that the capability enumeration sits inside the trigger clause, leaving the what-statement slightly abstract, and a few natural file-format terms are absent.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names the domain ('genomic interval analysis in Rust with Python bindings') and several concrete actions ('overlap detection', 'tokenization for ML models', 'fragment analysis', 'coverage tracks'), but the capability list lives in the when-clause rather than an enumerated what-statement, leaving minor gaps.

4 / 5

Completeness

Both parts are present: a clear what ('High-performance toolkit for genomic interval analysis in Rust with Python bindings') and an explicit 'Use when working with...' trigger list. Falls short of 5 because the what is a single abstract clause rather than the clearly enumerated action list of the top anchor.

4 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Natural terms a genomics user would say are well covered ('genomic regions', 'BED files', 'coverage tracks', 'overlap detection', 'fragment analysis', 'computational genomics'), but common synonyms and extensions like '.bed', 'BigWig', or 'peaks' are missing.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Occupies a clear niche (genomic interval analysis, BED files) with distinct trigger phrases; virtually no risk of firing for an unrelated skill.

5 / 5

Total

17

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

metadata_version

'metadata.version' is missing

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository

googolme/run0204

Path

scientific-skills/gtars/SKILL.md

Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.