Content
100%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
An exemplar opinionated workflow skill: dense and competence-assuming, with exact formulas, gating thresholds, a classification rubric, and a fixed report template. Workflow sequencing and validation checkpoints are explicit, and the file is well-structured with no deep reference nesting.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and information-dense — it assumes Claude knows UTM/fbclid/CAPI/CPA/CAC without explaining them, and every section delivers concrete methodology rather than padding; not the 2 anchor which includes unnecessary explanation, though the intro and 'Core principle' lightly restate the thesis. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides copy-paste-ready methodology — exact formulas ('True CAC = spend ÷ qualified leads', 'Vanity score = 1 − (Started ÷ Signups)'), coverage thresholds (≥80% / 50–80% / <50%), a classification rules table, and an exact report structure template; not the 2 anchor which relies on pseudocode or incomplete guidance. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear Phase 0–6 sequence with an explicit gating/validation step (Phase 1 coverage thresholds that control whether to proceed), a feedback loop (tracking-gap mode on <50% coverage), and checklists (Phase 0's must-answer questions, Output Standards); not the 2 anchor which has validation gaps. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Single self-contained file with well-organized headers and one-level-deep sibling-skill references in 'Related Skills' (no bundle files exist, no nested references); per the simple-skill scoring note, well-organized sections with no need for external references score 3. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |