Content
50%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-organized API catalog with concrete curl examples for nearly every endpoint, but it is held back by two malformed example payloads, an unexplained async request/poll workflow, inlined reference material that belongs in a separate file, and repeated boilerplate across parameter descriptions. It is serviceable but needs tightening and correctness fixes.
Suggestions
Fix the SmartScraper and SmartCrawler curl examples to wrap parameters in a "body":{...} object like the SearchScraper example, so they are copy-paste executable.
Document the async workflow explicitly: where the request_id/task_id comes from in the start response, how often to poll the status endpoints, and what status values mean.
Deduplicate the mock/stealth parameter descriptions and the Capability/Usage intro repetition, and move the per-endpoint parameter reference into a separate reference file linked from SKILL.md.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The parameter documentation is mostly necessary API-specific detail, but the '## Capabilities' bullets are repeated verbatim as Usage section intros, the mock-mode and stealth descriptions are restated nearly identically per endpoint, and the generic '## Use Cases' section pads tokens without adding guidance, matching 'Mostly efficient but includes some unnecessary explanation or could be tightened'. Not a 4 because the redundant repetition is more than minor. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Most endpoints have concrete curl commands, but the flagship SmartScraper and SmartCrawler examples contain malformed JSON (the "website_url"/"url" and "user_prompt"/"prompt" fields sit outside the payload with no "body":{...} wrapper), so they are not copy-paste executable, and SmartCrawler's parameters are listed without types or descriptions. This matches 'Some concrete guidance but incomplete... missing key details'; not a 4 because two of the primary examples are broken. | 3 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The document is organized per-endpoint but the core async workflow (start a request, capture the request_id from the response, poll the paired 'Get ... Status' endpoint until complete) is never stated — there is no guidance on where the id comes from, polling cadence, or status values, matching 'Steps listed but validation gaps; sequence present but checkpoints missing or implicit'. Not a 2 because each endpoint's usage is individually well-defined. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The single SKILL.md inlines the full parameter reference for 10+ endpoints with no bundle files to offload it, though sections (Setup, Capabilities, Usage, Discover More) keep it navigable and the 'Discover More' section points to live API discovery — matching 'Some structure but could be better organized; content that should be separate is inline'. Not a 2 because section headers and navigation are present. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 12 / 20 Passed |