CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

kiro-spec-status

Show specification status and progress

56

Quality

64%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./tools/cc-sdd/templates/agents/antigravity-skills/skills/kiro-spec-status/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Specification Status

<background_information>

  • Success Criteria:
    • Show current phase and completion status
    • Identify next actions and blockers
    • Provide clear visibility into progress
    • Surface boundary readiness, upstream/downstream context, and likely revalidation needs when available </background_information>
## Execution Steps

Step 1: Load Spec Context

  • Read {{KIRO_DIR}}/specs/$1/spec.json for metadata and phase status
  • Read {{KIRO_DIR}}/specs/$1/brief.md if it exists
  • Read existing files: requirements.md, design.md, tasks.md (if they exist)
  • Check {{KIRO_DIR}}/specs/$1/ directory for available files
  • Read {{KIRO_DIR}}/steering/roadmap.md if it exists and this spec appears in it

Step 2: Analyze Status

Parse each phase:

  • Requirements: Count requirements and acceptance criteria
  • Design: Check for architecture, components, diagrams, and whether boundary sections are present
  • Tasks: Count completed vs total tasks (parse - [x] vs - [ ])
  • Approvals: Check approval status in spec.json
  • Boundary context:
    • From brief.md: note Boundary Candidates, Upstream / Downstream, and Existing Spec Touchpoints if present
    • From design.md: note Boundary Commitments, Out of Boundary, Allowed Dependencies, and Revalidation Triggers if present
    • From roadmap.md: note upstream dependencies and whether this spec is adjacent to Existing Spec Updates
  • Revalidation watchlist:
    • Identify downstream specs, neighboring existing-spec updates, or rollout-sensitive design notes that may need revalidation if this spec changes
    • Call out when the current spec shape looks too broad and may want roadmap/design splitting instead of more local repair

Step 3: Generate Report

Create report in the language specified in spec.json covering:

  1. Current Phase & Progress: Where the spec is in the workflow
  2. Completion Status: Percentage complete for each phase
  3. Task Breakdown: If tasks exist, show completed/remaining counts
  4. Boundary Context: Upstream/downstream, out-of-boundary, and allowed dependency notes when available
  5. Revalidation Watchlist: Downstream or adjacent work likely affected by changes to this spec
  6. Next Actions: What needs to be done next
  7. Blockers: Any issues preventing progress

Safety & Fallback

Error Scenarios

Spec Not Found:

  • Message: "No spec found for $1. Check available specs in {{KIRO_DIR}}/specs/"
  • Action: List available spec directories

Incomplete Spec:

  • Warning: Identify which files are missing
  • Suggested Action: Point to next phase command

List All Specs

To see all available specs:

  • Run with no argument or use wildcard
  • Shows all specs in {{KIRO_DIR}}/specs/ with their status
Repository
gotalab/cc-sdd
Last updated
First committed

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.