Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is a lean, well-structured instruction skill with concrete file paths and clear sequencing plus useful error fallbacks. Its main gap is the report-generation step, which lists coverage points without fully specifying output formatting.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is well-organized into Load/Analyze/Generate steps with specific file paths and fields, and does not explain concepts Claude already knows; it is not 5 because the boundary-context and revalidation-watchlist bullets carry some wording that could be tightened. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | It gives concrete, executable guidance — exact paths like `{{KIRO_DIR}}/specs/$1/spec.json`, parse rules (`- [x]` vs `- [ ]`), and named fields to extract — which is actionable for an instruction-only skill; it is not 5 because the report-generation step is described as a coverage list rather than fully concrete output formatting. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Steps 1-3 are clearly sequenced and the Safety & Fallback section adds error checkpoints (Spec Not Found, Incomplete Spec) that serve as validation for a read-only reporting skill; it is not 5 because there is no explicit validate-then-retry feedback loop, though the destructive/batch cap does not apply here. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | This is a single-purpose, well-sectioned skill with no external references needed, matching the simple-skill exception allowing a 5 with clear organization; there are no nested or buried references to penalize. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |