Content
57%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-sectioned, mostly actionable instruction skill with concrete paths, tools, and an output template, but it is held back by redundant inlined principles, a missing referenced bundle file, a confusing dual Step/Workflow numbering, and only implicit validation for a file-creating workflow. It is functional but not tightly engineered.
Suggestions
Add an explicit validation checkpoint inside the workflow (e.g., after generating, verify the file does not duplicate core steering content and stays within 100-200 lines, with a fix-and-retry loop) to lift workflow_clarity above 3.
Reconcile the dual structure: merge "Step 1: Gather Context" into the single numbered Workflow so the sequence is linear and unambiguous.
Either create the referenced rules/steering-principles.md and inline only a one-line pointer to it, or drop the dangling reference and keep the principles inline without claiming a separate file — and move the 7-template catalog to a reference file with a one-line summary in SKILL.md.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly efficient but carries redundancy: the Steering Principles are inlined as a list while also being referenced from rules/steering-principles.md, and the Notes section restates earlier points ("Templates are starting points", "Follow same granularity principles"), fitting 'mostly efficient but could be tightened' rather than the lean anchor 4. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Guidance is concrete and executable for an instruction-only skill: specific file paths ({{KIRO_DIR}}/steering/{name}.md), named tools (Glob/Grep/Read), a 100-200 line target, and a copy-paste output template, with only the minor gap of no full example of a generated steering document, fitting 'mostly executable guidance; minor gaps'. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Five numbered steps are sequenced, but validation is implicit (mentioned only in a separate Safety & Fallback section as "Ensure doesn't duplicate core steering content") rather than an integrated checkpoint, and a confusing dual structure (### Step 1 followed by a separate ## Workflow 1-5) muddies the sequence; per the guidelines, missing validation for a file-writing operation caps this at 3. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Section headers organize the content reasonably, but the body references rules/steering-principles.md which does not exist in the bundle, and the principles plus the 7-template list are inlined rather than split into reference files, fitting 'some structure but content that should be separate is inline' rather than the well-split anchor 4. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 13 / 20 Passed |