Content
81%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is a well-structured, actionable validation workflow with explicit decision gates and feedback loops, and it is appropriately concise for the complexity it covers. Progressive disclosure is good but the single long file has no external reference layer.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense and targeted; the background section explains kiro-specific boundary terminology Claude would not already know, with only minor repeated emphasis on boundary integrity that could be trimmed — matching the 'efficient; minor instances of over-explanation' anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete commands (grep patterns for TBD/TODO and secrets, canonical command discovery), specific file paths under {{KIRO_DIR}}/specs/, and a copy-ready report template; judgment checks are necessarily descriptive rather than executable, matching the 'mostly executable guidance; minor gaps' anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear four-step sequence (Detect Target → Load Context → Execute Validation → Generate Report) with explicit validation gates (GO/NO-GO/MANUAL_VERIFY_REQUIRED) and a feedback loop (NO-GO → mandatory remediation → re-validate); the skill is read-only/idempotent so the destructive/batch cap does not apply, matching the top anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist and the skill is a self-contained cohesive workflow organized into well-labeled sections (background_information, instructions with numbered steps, Safety & Fallback), matching the 'good structure; most content appropriately placed' anchor; not a 5 because it is a single ~180-line document with no one-level-deep reference split. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |