Content
100%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
An exceptionally tight instruction skill: every token earns its place, the decision procedure is concrete and prioritized, and verification requirements are built in. Sections are well organized for a single-file skill with no bundle files to reference.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and efficient: every line is a load-bearing rule ('That is scope. Extra features are not.'; 'Deletion beats addition.'), with no explanation of concepts Claude already knows and no padding anywhere in the ~41-line body. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | For an instruction-only skill the guidance is fully executable: a six-step decision ladder in priority order, a verbatim comment template ('shortcut: <the limit>, <when to upgrade>'), a concrete verification rule, and a levels table with a switch command. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear sequence — scope in 'Before you write', then the decision ladder, then rules and levels — with an explicit verification checkpoint ('new non-trivial logic... leaves one small test or an assert-based self-check') and scope verification ('grep every caller'). Not a destructive/batch workflow, so no validation cap applies. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines with no need for external references; the body is well-organized into 'Before you write', 'The smallest complete change', and 'Levels' sections, which satisfies the simple-skill exception for full marks. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 20 / 20 Passed |