Content
96%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A high-quality, information-dense API-contract skill: exact endpoints, headers, payloads, status codes, and error-recovery guidance with no padding, plus real and well-signaled one-level-deep references. The only notable weakness is that substantial contract detail lives inline in SKILL.md where the bundle's reference pattern could carry it.
Suggestions
Move fine-grained refresh-transport rules (header sets, status-code mapping, replay/capacity semantics) into references/browser-refresh.md and keep a compact contract summary plus the pointer in SKILL.md.
Similarly trim the JWKS key-format specifics (kty/crv/x encoding, kid/alg behavior) into a short reference, keeping the endpoint contract and routing boundary inline.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense but every sentence carries project-specific contract detail — exact headers ('Accept: application/json', 'X-Authcrunch-Refresh: 1'), field names ('sandbox_id', 'sandbox_secret'), and status codes (401/403/403/503/405) that Claude cannot know. Nothing explains general concepts Claude already knows, matching the lean/every-token-earns-its-place anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Guidance is executable at the HTTP-contract level: numbered login steps with exact payloads and fields, exact endpoints ('POST <base>/api/refresh_token' with '{'+'{"refresh_token":"<credential>"}' body), exact query parameters, response semantics, and error codes. For an instruction-only API-contract skill this is copy-paste-ready; the few conditional points (e.g. 'portal-supported Authorization header') are configuration-dependent and are routed to the matching config skill. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The login challenge sequence is a clear 5-step numbered workflow with an explicit rotation checkpoint ('the portal may rotate sandbox_secret and return another challenge') and guardrails ('do not reuse an old sandbox_secret'). The Troubleshooting section provides error-recovery feedback loops keyed to specific symptoms, and verification is anchored to named E2E tests (TestCaddyTokenRefreshE2E, TestCaddyJWKSE2E). | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Structure is good: all five references/ files are real, one level deep, and clearly signaled with what each covers ('read [authentication flows](references/authentication-flows.md)'), and cross-skill pointers are explicit. Falls short of 5 because the body itself is a fairly long (213-line) carrier of fine-grained contract detail (refresh transport rules, JWKS key-format specifics) that a reference file could hold, leaving the overview less lean than the top anchor's 'content appropriately split' ideal. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |