Content
93%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A tight, highly actionable body that assumes Claude's competence and gives concrete commands, templates, and specs. The only minor gap is the absence of an explicit validation feedback loop in the screenshot/publish workflow.
Suggestions
Add an explicit feedback loop to the Pre-Publish Checklist, e.g., 'If the page fails to render, fix frontmatter/MDX errors and re-run pnpm --filter docs start before publishing.'
Clarify that the demo-state list (fixture → scripting → URL params → manual) is a priority/precedence order rather than a sequential workflow, to avoid misreading it as steps to perform in turn.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and well-structured: tables for specs, tight bullets, and no over-explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every section earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides copy-paste-ready guidance — build commands ('turbo build --filter=editor && turbo start --filter=editor'), a frontmatter/page-structure template, concrete screenshot specs (960x960 WebP q90), and named scripting surfaces (globalThis.grida, WindowGlobalCurrentEditorProvider). | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear sequencing in the demo-state priority list and a Pre-Publish Checklist that includes a render verification step ('pnpm --filter docs start'), but no explicit validate→fix→retry feedback loop for the capture/publish flow. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized into clearly labeled sections with one-level-deep, well-signaled deferrals (e.g., 'use the docs-svg-kit skill' for SVG figures and 'See docs/AGENTS.md' for linking rules); no nested reference chains. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |