CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

ee

Working pattern for enterprise-edition features in Grida — the commercial/hosted concerns (entitlement, BYOD, billing) on top of the OSS core. Anchor for the `GRIDA-EE: <surface>` grep marker, `(ee)` route group, `*-hosted` package suffix, and namespaced `grida_*` schema. Use when adding or touching an EE-only feature, or deciding whether a feature is EE territory. Surface skills (`ee-billing`) are siblings.

72

Quality

88%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

87%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A tight, highly actionable convention skill that avoids generic padding and delegates detail cleanly to sibling skills. The single weak dimension is workflow clarity: the numbered procedure is well-sequenced but contains no explicit validation checkpoints, though the convention-setting task does not strictly demand them.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Lean and Grida-specific throughout — it does not explain generic concepts Claude already knows; every section (marker convention, placement, dependency direction, security crossover) earns its place, including the load-bearing 'Known limitation' note.

3 / 3

Actionability

Provides copy-paste-ready concrete guidance: exact marker syntax (`// GRIDA-EE: entitlement — paid-plan gate`), an executable grep (`grep -rn 'GRIDA-EE' editor crates packages`), specific suffix/schema rules, and a numbered directive list — fully actionable for an instruction skill.

3 / 3

Workflow Clarity

The 'Working on EE features' section is a clearly numbered 4-step sequence (tag, place, dependency direction, fail-closed), but it lacks explicit validation/checkpoint steps; the 2-anchor (sequence present, checkpoints missing or implicit) fits better than the 3-anchor, which requires validation steps and feedback loops.

2 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

Well-organized into clear sections and appropriately delegates detail one level deep via well-signaled cross-skill links (`../naming/SKILL.md`, `../security/SKILL.md`, `../database/SKILL.md`) plus an external doc link; no bundle files exist to verify, and the single-file structure is appropriately split.

3 / 3

Total

11

/

12

Passed

Description

90%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong, third-person description that clearly states what the skill anchors and when to use it, with domain-natural trigger terms and low conflict risk. The only soft spot is specificity: it names concrete conventions/markers more than it lists concrete executable actions.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names the domain and concrete artifacts (`GRIDA-EE: <surface>` grep marker, `(ee)` route group, `*-hosted` package suffix, `grida_*` schema, surfaces entitlement/BYOD/billing), but the actions ('adding or touching an EE-only feature', 'deciding whether a feature is EE territory') are decisional rather than a list of concrete verbs like the 3-anchor's extract/fill/merge.

2 / 3

Completeness

Explicitly answers both what ('Working pattern for enterprise-edition features... Anchor for...') and when ('Use when adding or touching an EE-only feature, or deciding whether a feature is EE territory.'), matching the 3-anchor's what+explicit-trigger pattern.

3 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

The 'Use when...' clause and domain terms ('EE-only feature', 'EE territory', 'enterprise-edition', 'entitlement', 'BYOD', 'billing') give good coverage of the natural phrases a Grida developer would say when reaching for this skill.

3 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Highly specific to Grida's EE/OSS boundary, names sibling skills (`ee-billing`), and uses distinct triggers unlikely to fire for unrelated skills.

3 / 3

Total

11

/

12

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

relative_links

Relative link issues: 8 suspicious

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
gridaco/grida
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.