Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-crafted conventions skill: lean, project-specific, and actionable, with a grep-able marker convention, concrete placement rules, and a clear numbered workflow. Weak spots are minor — slight redundancy in the OSS/EE rationale framing and a couple of references to not-yet-existing siblings ('ee-billing' planned).
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense, project-specific convention text that assumes competence and defers detail to sibling skills, but the OSS-vs-hosted rationale is stated in the intro and re-echoed in the tenant-routing aside, so a few tokens could be trimmed — anchor 4, not the every-token-earns-its-place of 5. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete throughout: the exact grep command, tag formats with sub-labels, per-layer placement rules, and an explicit dependency-direction rule. Minor gaps — `ee-billing` is only 'planned' and the strip requirement has no verification command — keep it at anchor 4 rather than fully copy-paste-ready 5. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | 'Working on EE features' gives a clear numbered 4-step sequence with an explicit rule per step (tag, place, dependency direction, fail-closed), and it is not a destructive/batch workflow. No validation checkpoints exist, which fits anchor 4 (clear sequence, minor validation gaps) rather than 5, and is not merely listed steps as at 3. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist, and the single-file body is well-sectioned with nothing inlined that should be split; external pointers (sibling skills, the BYOD doc) are one level deep, clearly signaled, and consolidated in a 'See also' block — anchor 5. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |