Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is an efficient, actionable grounding reference: concrete scoped-ripgrep and docsearch commands, a clear per-surface authority table, and well-signaled one-level-deep references. The only soft spot is a mildly redundant opening paragraph and a decision-flow (vs. validate-loop) structure.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Dense and Grida-specific, assuming Claude's competence (no explanations of ripgrep/git), but the opening paragraph rephrases the frontmatter description and could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Copy-paste ready commands throughout — 'rg PATTERN editor/grida-canvas packages', 'rg PATTERN -g ''!**/docs/_history/**'', and 'uv run $S tags / find / show' — cover the common grounding cases with exact syntax. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The decision procedure is clear (name the surface → trust the authoritative source → reconcile disagreements with 'git log -1 recency, what the running entrypoint imports, what tests assert' → 'surface a material conflict to the user') but it is a decision flow rather than a validate-fix-retry loop. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized sections (Source of truth, Dead-tree traps, Grounding the docs, Related skills) with a single one-level-deep bundle reference to scripts/docsearch.py (verified present), keeping the overview navigable and detail pushed to the script. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |