Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, highly actionable body with executable commands, clear architecture diagrams, and sequenced task workflows backed by a verification section. Minor conciseness and validation-checkpoint gaps keep it just short of perfect.
Suggestions
Tighten the refig section's prose into a shorter pointer to the engine-repo skill to reclaim tokens without losing the navigation cue.
Add an explicit re-run-validation step at the end of the 'Debug a clipboard paste failure' and 'Add support for a new Figma property' flows (e.g., 'run pnpm turbo test for the affected test file and confirm green').
Consider moving the long REST response-shape list under a collapsible sub-section or reference file so the core orchestration overview stays scannable.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Largely lean — tables and command blocks that assume Claude's competence with no 'what is a Figma file' padding — but sections like the refig explanation carry a bit of prose that could be trimmed without losing clarity. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides copy-paste-ready commands throughout (pnpm --filter, npx tsx, python figma_archive.py), named public APIs (fig2grida, restJsonToGridaDocument), and file/role tables that fully cover the common cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Multi-step flows ('Add support for a new Figma property', 'Debug a clipboard paste failure') are clearly sequenced with a diagnostic feedback loop, and a dedicated Verification section exists, though some flows lack an explicit re-validate checkpoint. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized overview with a clearly signaled one-level-deep References table, pointers to sibling skills (io-grida, render-reftest), and the bundled figma_archive.py deferred to its own header — easy to navigate. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |