CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

io-grida

Guides work on the Grida file format (.grida) from the TS side: the I/O packages that read/write it (loading, archive packing, clipboard) and the frozen schema bindings. Use when working with .grida files in the editor or packages, or debugging format round-trip issues. (The schema and the Rust decoder live in the engine repo.)

76

Quality

93%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

87%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A lean, actionable codebase-reference skill: dense tables, concrete functions and paths, and executable verification commands. Its one weak spot is the schema-change workflow, which lists steps clearly but leaves the validation checkpoint implicit rather than integrated, costing it workflow clarity given the cross-repo risk involved.

Suggestions

Wire the Verification commands into the Schema Changes workflow as an explicit checkpoint — e.g. add step 4 'Run pnpm turbo test/typecheck --filter=@grida/io and only commit when both pass' so the feedback loop is part of the sequence rather than a separate section.

Add a brief explicit guard before step 1 of Schema Changes noting that the engine repo's SCHEMA_VERSION must already be bumped and verified, so the cross-repo lockstep has a pre-flight check.

Note explicitly that after re-snapshotting the frozen bindings (step 2) the formatter/linter-ignore status should be reconfirmed, closing the loop on the 'do not edit' tombstone constraint.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is information-dense — tables for variants and key locations, terse function lists, no explanation of what FlatBuffers or FlatBuffers schema generation is — so every token earns its place; the version pins (flatc v25.12.19, the "0.91.0-beta+20260311" example) are load-bearing facts rather than rote time-sensitive guidance, so they do not pull it below level 3.

3 / 3

Actionability

Concrete function names (io.load, io.is_grid, io.archive.pack/unpack, io.clipboard.encode/decode), exact package paths, and copy-paste-ready verification commands (pnpm turbo test/typecheck --filter) give executable guidance; the schema-change steps name the exact file and field to bump, matching the anchor for fully executable commands and specific examples.

3 / 3

Workflow Clarity

The Schema Changes section is a clear 3-step sequence (bump SCHEMA_VERSION in sync, re-snapshot frozen bindings, old files rejected), but the validation checkpoint is implicit — the separate Verification commands are not wired into the workflow as an explicit "run these before proceeding" feedback loop, and schema changes are risky cross-repo operations, which the rubric caps at 2; not level 3 because the validation step is not an integrated checkpoint.

2 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

With no bundle files present, the body is a well-organized overview (Format Overview, Key Locations, TS Side, tombstone, Verification, Schema Changes) and its only references are one-level-deep external engine-repo URLs that are clearly signaled, which the rubric treats as a 3 for a concise, well-structured skill.

3 / 3

Total

11

/

12

Passed

Description

100%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A tightly written third-person description that names the domain, lists concrete I/O capabilities, and provides an explicit "Use when..." trigger clause covering natural user phrasings. It is distinctive and unlikely to misfire against other skills.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Enumerates multiple concrete actions — "loading, archive packing, clipboard" and "the frozen schema bindings" — against a named domain, matching the anchor that lists several specific concrete actions rather than just naming the domain.

3 / 3

Completeness

Explicitly answers both what ("Guides work on... the I/O packages that read/write it..." and the frozen schema bindings) and when ("Use when working with .grida files... or debugging format round-trip issues"), matching the anchor for clear what AND when with explicit triggers.

3 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

The "Use when working with .grida files in the editor or packages, or debugging format round-trip issues" clause gives natural phrases a user would say (.grida files, editor, packages, round-trip); not level 2 because it covers the common variations rather than leaving gaps.

3 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The niche is sharply bounded to the Grida .grida format on the TS side with distinct triggers, making conflict with other skills unlikely; not level 2 because the scope is too specific to overlap meaningfully with sibling skills.

3 / 3

Total

12

/

12

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
gridaco/grida
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.