Content
90%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A tight, opinionated policy skill: lean token-efficient prose, concrete and executable guidance throughout, and a clear pre-PR workflow anchored by the cleaning-pass decision procedure. Its only shortfalls are a missing explicit fix-and-re-check loop in the cleaning pass and no reference/bundle structure to delegate detail into.
Suggestions
Add an explicit re-check step after 'recoverable question → fix it' (e.g., re-run the stranger-test on the fixed artifact before keeping it).
Consider moving the enumerated 'Common removals' list or the commit/PR-description standards into a short reference file to keep SKILL.md as a pure overview.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Every line carries repo-specific policy Claude does not already know — 'Push = publish', 'Use draft: true, defer the PR, or just don't ship', the stranger-test — with no padding, no tutorials on known concepts, and a dense but non-redundant TL;DR section. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | For an instruction-only skill the guidance is fully concrete: 'Use .env.local (gitignored) and fixture placeholders', 'rewrite as a neutral TODO with a tracking issue link', 'draft: true or delete', and a literal per-file question ('If a stranger reads this file with no context, does it help them...') with a three-branch decision tree (keep / fix it / drop). | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The sequence is explicit — the security skill's review runs first, the cleaning pass is downstream and is the 'Final pass before opening the PR', ending in the PR description and commit message — and the per-file stranger-test acts as a checkpoint. However, there is no explicit re-validation loop after a 'recoverable question → fix it' branch, so it sits just below the feedback-loop anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The 147-line body is well-sectioned with each scope (Code, Security, Docs, cleaning pass, PR description) clearly separated, and boundary detail is delegated to one-level-deep, clearly signaled peer skills ('The full boundary discipline lives in the security skill', 'See the links skill'). No bundle files exist to verify, and nothing is split into the skill's own reference files — solid structure with minor organization headroom. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |