CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo
SkillPublic

specflow-use

To connect Rosetta with Grid Dynamics SpecFlow MCP; only when SpecFlow is mentioned and the MCP is installed.

Quality

76%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide
SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./instructions/r2/core/skills/specflow-use/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

71%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A well-structured, appropriately de-cluttered instruction skill with an excellent reference bundle and mostly concrete guidance. The main cost is the redundant Quick Start section duplicating Steps 1–3, plus a couple of unspecified mechanics (current-version lookup, malformed gain.json handling).

Suggestions

Delete the Quick Start section or reduce it to a single routing sentence — its three bullets restate Steps 1–3 almost verbatim, including the duplicated gain.json auto-creation detail.

Specify how to determine the current Rosetta version for the compatibility check (e.g., where it is reported) and what the user should do after a major-version alert.

Add a brief fallback for a malformed or unreadable gain.json in Step 2 so the parse-and-display step has an error path.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Mostly efficient with no concept-teaching padding, but the 'Quick Start' section fully duplicates Steps 1–3 — the gain.json auto-creation detail ('the first SpecFlow MCP tool call will create both gain.json and specflow_session.json') appears nearly verbatim twice. Fits 'mostly efficient but could be tightened'; not 4 because the redundancy is a whole removable section rather than minor trimming.

3 / 5

Actionability

Concrete, executable guidance: exact file names, a defined search depth (workspace root plus up to 2 parents), a copy-paste summary template with exact JSON paths, and a named reference file per step. Minor gaps — e.g., the version check never says how to determine the 'current Rosetta version'. Not 5 because of that gap and the placeholder-only consolidation step.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

Steps 1–4 are clearly sequenced and include an explicit compatibility checkpoint with defined outcomes (minor difference → warn and continue; major difference → alert the user). Not 5 because there are no error-recovery paths (e.g., what to do when gain.json is malformed) and no follow-up action after the major-version alert.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

Verified against the actual bundle: all three references (specflow-mcp-tools.md, specflow-vocabulary.md, specflow-schema.md) exist, are well-signaled in a dedicated 'Reference Files' section with one-line purposes and 'read as needed' framing, are one level deep, and the detail is appropriately split out of SKILL.md. Easy navigation, clear overview.

5 / 5

Total

16

/

20

Passed

Description

68%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description has an excellent explicit trigger condition and near-zero conflict risk thanks to uniquely named products, but the 'what' is under-specified: a single generic verb ('connect') stands in for the skill's actual capabilities. Expanding one clause with the concrete actions would lift it substantially.

Suggestions

Replace the generic 'connect' with the skill's concrete actions, e.g.: 'Loads SpecFlow project context from gain.json, summarizes it, routes the user through pregeneration/generation/post-run phases via SpecFlow MCP, and consolidates review feedback into updated specs.'

Add key artifact names (gain.json, SpecFlow MCP tools) to give users additional natural trigger phrases beyond just 'SpecFlow'.

State the outcome of the connection (e.g., 'so Rosetta orders work and downloads outputs through MCP') so the 'what' is explicit rather than implied.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

The only action named is the generic 'connect', which names the domain (Rosetta, Grid Dynamics SpecFlow MCP) without any of the skill's concrete capabilities (loading gain.json context, phase routing, consolidating review feedback) — closely matching 'Processes PDF files'. Not 3 because no concrete actions beyond 'connect' are listed.

2 / 5

Completeness

Has an explicit and specific 'when' ('only when SpecFlow is mentioned and the MCP is installed') but a thin 'what' — 'To connect Rosetta with Grid Dynamics SpecFlow MCP' states purpose without what the skill actually does. Fits 'both present, one could be stronger'; not 5 because the 'what' is vague.

4 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Includes good natural keywords a user would say: 'SpecFlow', 'Rosetta', 'MCP', 'Grid Dynamics SpecFlow MCP'. Not 5 because common variations are missing (e.g., 'GAIN', 'gain.json', 'spec generation/review').

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

A clear niche with distinctly named products (Rosetta, Grid Dynamics SpecFlow MCP) and explicit gating conditions ('SpecFlow is mentioned and the MCP is installed'); minimal conflict risk with any other skill.

5 / 5

Total

15

/

20

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository

griddynamics/rosetta

Path

instructions/r2/core/skills/specflow-use/SKILL.md

Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.