Content
100%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a tight, fully actionable instruction set: it enumerates exactly which docs to audit and what claim types to verify, specifies the issue title and body format with a worked example, and includes validation checkpoints (duplicate check, command verification, done-when criteria) plus graceful empty-result handling. It contains no filler, no over-explanation, and needs no external files at this size.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The ~35-line body has no padding or general-concept explanation: the short intro carries non-inferable project facts ("Agents read these docs before they work", "the factory ships the fixes"), and the "What to check" / "What to file" sections are entirely task-specific. Every token earns its place, matching the lean-and-efficient anchor rather than the minor-over-explanation 4 anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Guidance is fully concrete and copy-paste ready: the title template "Docs: <file> is out of date", a line-pointer example "src/games/water-cannon/game.ts:12", per-doc-type check lists with specifics ("shot counts, speeds, points", "URL parameters, keys"), and a concrete "Done when" tied to "npm run check". As an instruction-only skill this matches the fully-executable top anchor; there is no pseudocode or vague direction. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear two-phase sequence (audit each doc's claims, then file) with explicit validation checkpoints for a batch operation: duplicate guard ("Before filing, check the open issues and skip any doc that already has one"), command verification ("Run commands like npm run check if you need to confirm one works"), and the edge case "Nothing found is a fine result. Say so, and file nothing." The batch-operation cap does not apply because verification steps are present, so this matches the top anchor rather than the minor-validation-gaps 4 anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is under 50 lines with no external references needed and no bundle files present; the two well-organized sections ("What to check", "What to file") plus a brief purpose intro satisfy the simple-skill criterion for the top score. The paths it cites (README.md, AGENTS.md, src/games/<game-id>/README.md, SKILL.md) are audit targets in the repo, not skill bundle references, so there are no dangling or buried references. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 20 / 20 Passed |