CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

provider-actions

Implement Terraform Provider actions using the Plugin Framework. Use when developing imperative operations that execute at lifecycle events (before/after create, update, destroy).

65

Quality

79%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./plugins/terraform/skills/provider-actions/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

71%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A comprehensive, executable guide with strong code examples, checklists, and validation steps for implementing Terraform Provider actions. Its main weakness is monolithic structure with no progressive disclosure via bundle files despite its length.

Suggestions

Move the detailed polling/timeout code, documentation standards, and changelog format into reference files under ./references/ and link to them from SKILL.md to improve progressive disclosure.

Tighten the 'Common Action Patterns' bullet lists into concrete code snippets or remove the generic guidance that does not add executable detail.

Replace the placeholder comments in the Invoke example ('// Implement action logic with error handling') with a minimal concrete call so the example is fully executable as written.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Mostly lean and technical, assuming Claude's competence without explaining what Terraform is; a few generic bullet lists ('Common Action Patterns') and inline comments could be trimmed, but not enough padding to drop to 3.

4 / 5

Actionability

Provides concrete, mostly copy-paste-ready Go and HCL examples plus exact commands ('go test -c', 'TF_ACC=1 go test ...'); minor gaps like placeholder comments ('// Implement action logic') in the Invoke example keep it just below 5.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

Clear sequenced setup steps, schema-validation and pre-submission checklists, and compile-then-test ordering with cleanup (sweepers); validation checkpoints are present, with only minor gaps preventing a 5.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

Well-sectioned single file with clearly signaled cross-skill references ('use the provider-test-patterns skill, if available'), but no bundle files are used and ~500 lines of detail (polling code, documentation standards, changelog format) that could live in references is inlined.

3 / 5

Total

15

/

20

Passed

Description

87%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong, third-person description that concretely states both capability and trigger conditions with specific lifecycle-event keywords. It is concise, distinct, and uses an explicit 'Use when...' clause with concrete triggers.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names the domain ('Terraform Provider actions', 'Plugin Framework') and concrete actions ('implement', 'imperative operations that execute at lifecycle events') with specific event enumeration, but stops short of the fully comprehensive multi-action coverage of a 5.

4 / 5

Completeness

Clearly answers both what ('Implement Terraform Provider actions using the Plugin Framework') and when ('Use when developing imperative operations that execute at lifecycle events (before/after create, update, destroy)') with concrete trigger phrases.

5 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Good natural keyword coverage ('Terraform Provider actions', 'Plugin Framework', 'lifecycle events', 'create, update, destroy') that a developer would naturally say, with only minor variations/synonyms missing.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

A clear niche (Terraform Provider Plugin Framework actions at lifecycle events) with distinct triggers and minimal overlap risk with other skills.

5 / 5

Total

18

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

skill_md_line_count

SKILL.md is long (516 lines); consider splitting into references/ and linking

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
hashicorp/agent-skills
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.