Content
82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-organized routing skill that is token-lean and routes cleanly to verified sub-skill references with version-aware branching. The main gaps are an unreferenced bundle file (verified-syntax.md) and validation steps that are mentioned but not wired as explicit feedback-loop checkpoints.
Suggestions
Link references/verified-syntax.md from the body (e.g., in the Routing table or a Syntax reference section) so all bundle files are navigable.
Add an explicit validation checkpoint to the authoring flow, e.g. "After writing .policy.hcl, run tfpolicy validate and fix errors before proceeding", to strengthen the feedback loop.
Surface a one-line test-loop reminder (tfpolicy test against .policytest.hcl) in the routing guidance so verification is sequenced rather than implied.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean: USE FOR / DO NOT USE FOR lists, a routing table, and a concise version-branching block with no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows, matching the lean-and-efficient anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete version-conditional rules ("include a top-level policy { required_providers { ... } } block") and executable bash install commands are present, but the bulk of authoring detail is delegated to references, leaving minor gaps in inline executable guidance. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear sequence exists (check CLI version → branch on 0.1.x vs 0.2.0+ → route to sub-skill) with most checkpoints present, though validation via tfpolicy validate/policytest is referenced rather than sequenced as an explicit feedback loop. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The overview points to real one-level-deep references (tfpolicy-author.md, tfpolicy-test.md) with a routing table, but references/verified-syntax.md exists in the bundle without being linked from the body, a minor navigation gap. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |