CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

idea-generator

The Idea Generator is the brainstorming specialist for Headout's PM OS. Engage after a Problem Frame is complete — or directly when a PM has a clear problem statement and wants to explore the solution space rigorously before committing to a direction. Acts as a high-fidelity thought partner: builds deep context through a multi-round interview (current state, constraints, prior attempts, platform nuances), maps the solution space into 2-4 strategic themes before generating any ideas, then produces specific ideas within each theme. Trigger for: "what are the ways we could solve this", "brainstorm approaches to X", "what should we build for this problem", "explore the solution space", "I have a problem frame and want ideas", "ideate on this", "what directions could we go", or any request to generate solution directions after a problem has been framed. Output: a structured Idea Brief.

88

1.02x
Quality

88%

Does it follow best practices?

Impact

81%

1.02x

Average score across 3 eval scenarios

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No known issues

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Evaluation results

85%

11%

Idea Brief: New-to-City Repeat Booking

Idea Brief structure and theme-map quality

Criteria
Without context
With context

Correct filename

100%

100%

Problem in One Sentence section

80%

100%

Context Built section — three sub-points

37%

100%

Solution Space table

62%

100%

2-4 strategic themes

100%

100%

Themes are levers, not features

100%

100%

History signal per theme

71%

100%

Minimum 2 ideas per theme

100%

100%

Idea effort signal

16%

0%

Idea novelty signal

0%

0%

Headout-specific angle per idea

100%

87%

Recommended Direction section

100%

100%

Second and third options positioned

50%

100%

Open Questions section

100%

60%

What We're NOT Exploring section

83%

100%

Q2'25 carousel attempt referenced

100%

100%

82%

Idea Brief: Group Booking Conversion

Structured critique and 4-dimension scoring in Idea Brief

Criteria
Without context
With context

Correct filename

100%

100%

Critique: Redundancy check

100%

100%

Critique: User motivation alignment

100%

100%

Critique: Platform fit (MB)

100%

100%

Critique: Metric connection

100%

100%

Critique: Coverage check

100%

100%

Scoring with 4 dimensions

10%

20%

1-3 scale used

0%

0%

Top recommendation named explicitly

100%

100%

Second/third options positioned as fallbacks

100%

100%

Prior Q1'25 experiment referenced

100%

100%

Ideas NOT already attempted

100%

100%

What We're NOT Exploring section

50%

100%

Pillar alignment referenced

100%

0%

76%

-6%

Idea Brief: Non-POI Experience Discovery

Behavioral grounding and Headout-specific idea quality

Criteria
Without context
With context

Correct filename

100%

100%

Behavioral framing in ideas

100%

100%

Headout-specific angle — not generic

100%

70%

MB feasibility addressed per idea

100%

100%

Themes are strategic levers

50%

70%

Prior failed attempts addressed

100%

100%

Ideas not a repeat of flat experiments

100%

100%

Metric named per idea

100%

62%

Non-POIs to the Moon pillar connected

16%

33%

Effort and novelty signals

25%

37%

Open Questions section

100%

100%

What We're NOT Exploring section

100%

60%

First bet named with justification

66%

66%

At least 2 ideas per theme

100%

50%

Repository
headout/pm-os-marketplace
Evaluated
Agent
Claude Code
Model
Claude Sonnet 4.6

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.