Content
61%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, actionable doctrine document with concrete numeric guidance and clean sectioning. Its main weakness is repetition across the intro, model, and synthesis sections, and the absence of any sequenced workflow or validation loop — acceptable here given its doctrinal nature but reflected in the workflow score.
Suggestions
Collapse the closing 'Why these two rules are one doctrine' section into a short bullet list or fold it into the intro, since it restates the rail/embed and overlay-not-band points already made above.
Consolidate the rail-first/embed-scarce rules so they appear once (either in the table section or the quoted non-negotiables) rather than being partially repeated across the intro, table, and quoted list.
If a typical captioning pass has a recommended order (e.g., classify each phrase → place rail → promote at most one embed → visually QA caption-over-content legibility), surface it as a short numbered checklist with the existing 'judge legibility visually' step as the validation checkpoint.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient and free of generic-concept padding, but the opening 'Two ideas combine here' paragraph, the model section, and the closing 'Why these two rules are one doctrine' section restate the same rail/embed and overlay-not-band principles, so it could be tightened. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Gives concrete, actionable specifics — '≤1 embed per beat', 'never two adjacent or co-visible', '≥ a beat apart', 'y = H / 2 (landscape 540, portrait 960)', 'bottom ~5-8% of canvas height', '~80px center span' — leaving only minor abstraction in the doctrinal framing. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The decision rules (drop/rail/embed, captions enabled vs disabled, Standard vs Cinematic) are clearly organized, but there is no sequenced multi-step workflow or validation checkpoint because the skill is a doctrine rather than a procedure. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized into clearly headed sections (caption model, overlay law, synthesis) with no nested references; the only external mentions (embedded-captions, product-launch-video scene agent) are upstream skills appropriately signaled rather than bundle files. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 14 / 20 Passed |