Content
71%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A conceptually strong, well-structured skill body: the carve workflow, group/bus semantics, and verification guidance are concrete and largely executable, and progressive disclosure into the four reference files is exemplary. The main cost is token weight — general audio-engineering pedagogy and long rationale narratives that assume too little of the reader.
Suggestions
Cut explanations of standard audio DSP (what compression, limiting, gating, and reverb tails do) down to one-line reminders, keeping only HyperFrames-specific semantics such as truepeak's 1.7 dB overshoot and worklet effects exposing no automatable params.
Replace the two mermaid architecture diagrams with a short prose summary; internal module names (audioFxGraph.ts, buildFxChain, scheduleChainAutomation) belong in a reference file, not the overview.
Compress the 'One knob' strength deliberation (0.25 / 0.5 / 0.8 defaults) into a compact strength-to-result table and move the practice notes to references/presets.md.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly high-value HyperFrames-specific guidance, but it explains standard audio concepts Claude already knows ("Compression narrows the distance between loud and quiet", "A limiter pulls peaks down toward a ceiling", reverb/delay tails that "occupy the same room a voice needs") and spends long narrative passages on tuning rationale (the strength 0.25/0.5/0.8 deliberation, "judged too weak in practice") plus two large mermaid architecture diagrams. Not 4: the over-explanation is recurring across sections rather than a minor instance that could be trimmed. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete and executable where it counts: the headless command "node <SKILL_DIR>/scripts/carve.mjs --comp index.html" with all flags (--bed, --voice, --strength, --dry-run), complete copy-paste JSON for the bus chain and the carve attribute, sample CLI output, and verification via "npx hyperframes check". Not 5: exact lane/chain JSON for the advertised fade and automation cases is deferred to references/attributes.md rather than shown inline, so a few common cases lack copy-paste detail in the body itself. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The flagship carve workflow is an explicit ordered sequence with a validation gate ("Place both tracks, run the command below... confirm the written data-fx-carve, data-fx-chain and data-automation with npx hyperframes check, and only then render"), plus a --dry-run checkpoint and a listen-based feedback loop in Verify ("If the bed sounds notched... the strength is too high"). Not 5: the sequence is distributed across prose sections rather than a consolidated checklist, and non-carve chain-building is guided by ordering principles ("Subtract before you add, level after you filter...") instead of explicit steps. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The overview role is respected with well-signaled one-level-deep references: exact JSON to "references/attributes.md", the effect catalog to "references/fx-registry.md", diagnosis commands to "references/diagnosis.md", and presets to "references/presets.md" (bolded, with 'read that before hand-building a chain') — all verified to exist, and the only cross-file link (presets.md → fx-registry.md) is a sibling, so depth stays at one level. Not 4: no catalog or API bulk is inlined and each pointer states what it contains and when to read it. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |