Content
88%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
An exemplary multi-step workflow with explicit gates, validation, feedback loops, and executable commands, plus well-structured progressive disclosure. The one notable defect is the missing sub-agents/frame-worker.md file that Step 4, the Quick Reference, and the directory layout all cite.
Suggestions
Add the missing sub-agents/frame-worker.md (or correct the path) — Step 4 dispatch depends on it but the directory is absent from the bundle.
De-duplicate the 'one analyzer, trust it' guidance between the 'Two ideas' section and Step 1 to tighten conciseness.
Reconcile the directory-layout block with the actual bundle so listed paths (e.g. sub-agents/) all resolve.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Dense, operational prose that mostly assumes Claude's competence, but the 'one analyzer / trust it' message is repeated across 'Two ideas' and Step 1 and could be tightened — efficient with minor trimmable redundancy. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Multiple copy-paste-ready command blocks with real flags (init, analyze-beatgrid.py, validate-plan.mjs, assemble-index.mjs, check, render) cover the common cases fully. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Steps 0–6 are explicitly sequenced with a Gate after each, validation gates (validate-plan.mjs, hyperframes check), feedback loops (fix every ✗, re-dispatch, re-assemble), and a resume table for error recovery. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-signaled one-level-deep references with a Quick Reference table and content split across references/ and scripts/ — but sub-agents/frame-worker.md is referenced repeatedly while no sub-agents/ directory exists in the bundle, a broken reference that keeps this below 5. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |