Conciseness

The body is dense with non-obvious house rules and exact values ("7cqw", "duration: 0.4–0.92s", "transformOrigin: '21% 14%'") and spends no tokens explaining concepts Claude already knows; the few stylistic phrases ("it must feel like it entered the room") encode non-obvious design intent rather than padding. Matches the lean/efficient anchor 5; not 4 because there is no over-explanation to trim.

Actionability

Concrete, copy-paste-ready CSS and GSAP snippets cover the common cases — entry glide (fromTo with power3.out), asymmetric click tap (scale 0.84 → 1 at 1:2 ratio), and cut-the-curve handoff — with exact parameters, plus an explicit failure mode to avoid ("Never opacity-fade it in… that reads as a glitch"). Matches the fully-executable anchor 5; not 4 because the examples include the specific values needed to reproduce the technique.

Workflow Clarity

Sections follow the cursor lifecycle in order — size/look → entry → tip-targeting/click → click-ignites-next-beat → drift → exit — and the body closes with an explicit "Checklist" of six verification items. No destructive or batch operation is involved, so no validation loop is required, and the single-technique process is unambiguous. Matches anchor 5's checklist standard; not 4 because the checklist provides the explicit checkpoint structure.

Progressive Disclosure

No bundle files exist (references/, scripts/, assets/ are absent) and the body references none, so there are no buried or nested references; sections are clearly headed and navigable. At ~130 lines fully inline, however, self-contained secondary detail (e.g., the brand-motif cursor variants) could arguably live in a one-level-deep reference. Good structure with minor organization gaps — anchor 4, not 5, which is reserved for a clear overview that offloads detail to well-signaled separate files.

Specificity

The description enumerates concrete capabilities: "Covers cursor size/look (incl. brand-motif cursors), the off-screen entry law, tip-targeting and the click tap, click-ignites-the-next-beat, and exit / cross-scene handoff" — multiple specific actions with comprehensive coverage of the technique's facets, matching the 5 anchor. Not 4 because coverage has no gaps; not below because every clause names a concrete capability rather than generic language.

Completeness

Explicitly answers both: "what" in the first and last sentences (house-style oversized macOS cursor technique covering size/look, entry law, tip-targeting, click-ignition, exit/handoff) and "when" via "Load whenever a scene involves cursors or a pointer-led action, when kicking off a UI scene, when igniting a morph/transition/typing run with a click, or when a scene reads as static, dead, or stale". Matches the 5 anchor with concrete trigger phrases; anchor 4's 'when could be more explicit' does not apply.

Trigger Term Quality

Natural user-facing terms are present ("a scene involves cursors or a pointer-led action", "with a click", "launch videos"), but coverage leans on house jargon ("igniting a morph/transition/typing run", "HyperFrames", "segment them out of the stale state") and misses plainer synonyms. This sits above the midpoint of anchor 3 (some keywords, missing variations) but below anchor 5's comprehensive synonym coverage — noticeably above midpoint, so 4.

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The skill occupies a clear niche (oversized cursor technique for launch videos) with distinct triggers, but the catch-all trigger "when a scene reads as static, dead, or stale and needs a cheap high-yield source of motion" could plausibly fire for other motion/animation skills. Mostly distinct with minor overlap risk against closely related motion skills — anchor 4, not 5.