Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-engineered content body: executable fetch code, a precise field-extraction table, a clearly specified five-part briefing structure with concrete thresholds, and clean deferral to a single real reference file. The only weaknesses are minor — a duplicated disclaimer, some host-specific probe meta-commentary, and the absence of an explicit error-recovery loop for failed installs or empty API responses.
Suggestions
State the not-financial-advice caveat once (either the intro disclaimer or Step 4) instead of repeating it in both places, and trim the host-specific probe framing to a single short instruction.
Add a brief error-recovery step: what to do if the pip install fails, or if key data sources return empty (e.g., an empty calendar dict), rather than only handling missing fields at briefing time.
Simplify the nested-exec shell probe to a plain `python3 -c "import yfinance; print(yfinance.__version__)"` style check so it is readable and portable across hosts.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is largely table- and code-driven with almost no padding, but there are trimmable redundancies: the not-financial-advice caveat appears both in the intro disclaimer and again in Step 4, and the "If your host has not already executed the shell probes below (for example, in Codex)" host meta-commentary plus the convoluted nested-exec `!` probe could be simplified. This sits above the 3 anchor (only minor over-explanation) but short of the 5 anchor where every token earns its place. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | The guidance is fully executable: a copy-paste-ready fetch script, an exact key-fields table per data source, and concrete heuristics such as "a time at or after 16:00 ET means after the close" and "a high/low spread wider than about 20% of consensus signals unusual uncertainty". The `# replace with actual ticker` comment makes the one placeholder explicit, matching the 5 anchor for copy-paste-ready coverage of common cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The four steps are clearly sequenced with an install-validation checkpoint (probe → install if missing → skip if present) and missing-data handling ("if the data for one is missing, say so in a line rather than dropping it"), which fits the 4 anchor. It falls short of 5 because there is no error-recovery loop for failed installs or empty fetches — e.g., the empty-`calendar` edge case is only documented in the reference file, not in the workflow. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is an overview that keeps only a key-fields summary inline and pushes detailed method signatures and edge cases to a single, real, one-level-deep reference (references/api_reference.md), clearly signaled with purpose ("Read the reference file when you need exact method signatures or edge case handling"). This matches the 5 anchor for well-signaled, appropriately split content with easy navigation. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |