Content
82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a strong, actionable reference: concrete YAML for every server shape plus a real verification checklist, with no fluff and no unnecessary external references. The only meaningful gap is an explicit validate-and-retry loop tying the verification steps back into the editing workflow.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is efficient: terse numbered Core Rules and copy-paste YAML with no padding about what MCP is, assuming Claude's competence; it stays at 4 rather than 5 because a few explanatory notes (e.g. the invalid placeholder example and its prose) could be tightened slightly. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully executable, copy-paste-ready YAML shapes for remote, local, and catalog servers cover the common cases, paired with concrete rules (strict "server.tool" ids, non-empty command token lists, "{env:VAR}" header syntax); this matches the 'fully executable, specific examples cover common cases' anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A numbered Verification section provides explicit validation checkpoints (confirm mcp_registry shape, server.tool ids, referenced server ids, placeholder syntax), avoiding the destructive/batch cap; it is a 4 rather than 5 because an explicit 'if validation fails, fix and re-verify' feedback loop is only implied, not stated. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Content is well-organized into clearly headed, one-level sections (Remote/Local/Catalog/App-managed/Verification) with no nested or buried references and no bundle files needed; it is a 4 rather than 5 because the single-file body is somewhat long for SKILL.md and a couple of the shape examples could optionally live in referenced files. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |