Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-organized, lean instruction skill with concrete guidance and a clear sequenced workflow plus a data-quality checkpoint. Its main gaps are the absence of a worked example and a validate-retry feedback loop, which keep actionability and workflow clarity at 4 rather than 5.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and does not explain concepts Claude already knows, but a few stylistic flourishes ("Report like an analyst the team actually wants to hear from", "Keep tables tight and the prose tighter") are mild over-explanation that could be trimmed, fitting the efficient-with-minor-instances anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Guidance is concrete and specific — named metrics ("engagement, reach, growth"), explicit counts ("3-5 concrete recommendations", "3-5 sentences"), and a defined output section structure — but no worked example or sample output is provided, leaving a minor gap. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The five numbered steps give a clear sequence and there is an explicit data-quality checkpoint ("Flag data quality issues... rather than reporting on top of broken inputs"), but there is no validate→fix→retry feedback loop for handling flagged bad data, so it stops short of the top anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is under 50 lines, single-purpose, and organized into clear sections (When to use, Reporting principles, How to approach, Output format) with a well-signaled boundary pointer to "Audience Analyst"; no external references are needed, so per the simple-skill guideline it scores 5 on organization alone. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |