Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-structured, lean instruction-only skill with actionable calibration guidance, a clear sequenced workflow including a validation checkpoint, and clean sectioning appropriate for its size. Its main gap is the absence of a concrete before/after example and an explicit batch verification step.
Suggestions
Add one short before/after rewrite example to make the tone shift concrete and copy-paste illustrative.
Add an explicit verification step for batch jobs (e.g. 'after the batch, spot-check each piece against its source for lost facts').
Trim minor asides like 'use wit sparingly; it ages badly and can undercut credibility' to keep every token load-bearing.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is efficient and avoids explaining concepts Claude already knows; guidance like the tone axes and preserve-meaning list each earn their tokens, with only minor trimmable asides (e.g. 'it ages badly and can undercut credibility'). | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | It gives concrete calibration axes with specific sub-features (contractions, sentence length, hedging vs. directness), a 3-step procedure, and a defined output format; it falls short of 5 only because no before/after rewrite example is shown. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The 'How to work' section sequences three clear steps including an explicit validation checkpoint ('Re-read against the original to confirm no fact or commitment changed'); the batch-jobs note lacks an explicit per-item verification, keeping it just below 5. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is under 50 lines with no external references needed and is organized into well-signaled sections (When to use, Preserve meaning, tone palette, How to work, Output format), matching the simple-skill exception for a 5. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |