Content
81%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A tight, actionable single-purpose skill with a clear multi-step workflow and an explicit human-confirmation checkpoint. The main gap is placeholder substitution in the label command and the absence of separate reference files, though the latter is acceptable for a skill this small.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean body that assumes Claude's competence and avoids explaining basic concepts; the bot-disclaimer block and label table earn their tokens, with only minor trimmable phrasing. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete executable `gh` commands and a copy-paste heredoc comment template; the label-application command uses placeholders like '<classification>' that the agent must fill in, a minor gap from fully copy-paste ready. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Steps are clearly sequenced (fetch -> research -> assess -> label -> draft -> apply/post) with an explicit human-confirmation checkpoint and a validation gate ('Wait for user confirmation before proceeding'); the research-before-concluding guidance functions as a feedback loop. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized into a single concise overview with clear section headers and no external references needed (under 50 lines, single-purpose), so it scores high by the simple-skill exception; not a 5 only because no separate reference files exist to demonstrate one-level-deep navigation. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |