Create AiderDesk agent profiles via interactive Q&A.
Overall
score
86%
Validation for skill structure
Discovery
N/ABased on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.
Something went wrong
Implementation
85%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This is a well-structured skill with clear actionable guidance for creating agent profiles through an interactive Q&A process. The workflow is explicit with good validation checkpoints, and references are well-organized. Minor verbosity in repeated reference listings and inline summaries of content that exists in referenced docs slightly reduces token efficiency.
Suggestions
Remove the 'Tool Group Reference' section or reduce it to a single line pointing to the reference doc, since this duplicates content in references/agent-profile-schema.md
Consolidate the reference file listings - they appear in the header, inline throughout, and in the Resources section; one authoritative list would suffice
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Content is mostly efficient but has some redundancy - references are listed multiple times (header, inline, and Resources section), and some explanations could be tighter (e.g., the Tool Group Reference section repeats information likely in the referenced docs). | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides concrete, step-by-step Q&A process with specific questions to ask, clear file paths, exact format specifications (e.g., provider/model format, tool key format with three dashes), and explicit defaults. The workflow is copy-paste ready for execution. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear 6-step sequential process with explicit checkpoints (single review before creation), validation requirements listed, and clear decision points (when to skip Step 3, when to enable Aider Tools). The workflow has appropriate gates before the destructive action of file creation. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Excellent structure with overview in SKILL.md and clear one-level-deep references to detailed docs (schema, examples, guides). References are well-signaled with specific file paths and purposes. Content is appropriately split between overview and detailed reference materials. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |
Validation
75%Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.
Validation — 12 / 16 Passed
Validation for skill structure
| Criteria | Description | Result |
|---|---|---|
description_trigger_hint | Description may be missing an explicit 'when to use' trigger hint (e.g., 'Use when...') | Warning |
metadata_version | 'metadata' field is not a dictionary | Warning |
license_field | 'license' field is missing | Warning |
body_steps | No step-by-step structure detected (no ordered list); consider adding a simple workflow | Warning |
Total | 12 / 16 Passed | |
Table of Contents
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.