Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The skill body is a tight, well-structured directive with concrete output contracts and a properly externalized source list. Its main gap is the absence of a ready-to-use HTML template and explicit validation feedback loops in the workflow.
Suggestions
Add a minimal copy-paste HTML skeleton in the HTML Output Contract so the report structure is executable rather than only specified.
Insert an explicit validation checkpoint in the Workflow (e.g. verify links resolve and every source is accounted for before emitting the report) to create a validate->fix->retry loop.
Consider externalizing the detailed HTML visual/layout requirements into a reference file to keep SKILL.md as a leaner overview.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and directive with no padding or explanations of concepts Claude already knows, though a few prescriptive lists (e.g. visual requirements) could be tightened slightly. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete file paths, exact counts (pick 10, <=100 Chinese chars), and a specific output contract, but offers no copy-paste HTML template or code, leaving the rendering to be assembled from the spec. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear six-step numbered workflow with some validation (dedup step, unread/access-blocked marking) is present, though explicit validate-then-retry feedback checkpoints are implicit rather than spelled out. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Content is well-organized into clear sections and externalizes the source list to a real, clearly signaled one-level-deep reference (references/source-list.md), though most guidance remains inline with only a single externalized file. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |