Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a tight, executable specification: concrete selection rules, a sequenced workflow with honesty safeguards, and a detailed HTML output contract, with source details properly pushed to a one-level reference file. Only minor duplication and the lack of an explicit output-validation loop keep it from full marks.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean, imperative, and free of concept explanations Claude already knows, but it repeats itself slightly — the <=100 Chinese character summary rule appears in both the Trigger block and workflow step 5, and unread/access-blocked notes are stated twice — so it falls just short of the every-token-earns-its-place 5 anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | As an instruction-only skill it gives fully actionable guidance: exact output path pattern, exact report title format, a concrete classification taxonomy, ranked priority areas, a specified digest format, and a detailed HTML output contract. Per the rubric's code-vs-instruction note, the absence of code is not penalized when guidance is this specific. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The 6-step workflow is clearly sequenced with error-handling practices (mark sources unread, never pretend a source was read, verify receipt/readback), but there is no explicit validate-then-fix-retry checkpoint over the produced output, matching the 4 anchor (most checkpoints present, minor validation gaps). | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A well-sectioned overview with a single clearly signaled, one-level-deep reference ('Read references/source-list.md for the default source set and source roles') that exists in the bundle; no buried or nested references, matching the 5 anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |