CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

deepsearch

深度研究代理系统社区版,对复杂主题进行多轮迭代的网络搜索和综合分析。使用场景:当用户需要对特定主题进行深入、全面的研究时,特别是需要基于最新网络信息生成详细分析报告的情况。支持多轮迭代搜索、智能搜索方向调整和综合分析报告生成。本skill是一个工作流描述文档,没有执行脚本,依赖web-search skill进行网页搜索。

57

Quality

66%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./.trae/openclaw-skills/deepsearch/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

50%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A clearly sequenced workflow description with concrete commands and a useful variable/JSON schema, but it is verbose with redundant sections, lacks validation checkpoints for its iterative batch nature, and ships as a monolithic file with no reference structure.

Suggestions

Add validation checkpoints to the iteration loop (e.g., confirm web-search returned results, confirm the LLM JSON parsed before branching on shouldContinue) to support error recovery in this batch workflow.

Provide concrete prompt templates or schemas for the two LLM steps (analysis and synthesis) instead of leaving them as '使用LLM分析' abstractions.

Trim redundant sections — fold '技术特点' into the workflow and move '使用场景'/'故障排除'/the output template into separate reference files to reduce token bloat and improve navigation.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The core workflow is useful, but sections like '技术特点' restate workflow features already described, '使用场景' duplicates the description, and the large placeholder output template adds padding that could be trimmed.

3 / 5

Actionability

Provides concrete, executable elements (the `python scripts/web_search.py "<query>"` command, the nextSearchTopic/shouldContinue JSON schema, the variable table), but the LLM analysis steps are abstract with no prompt templates and the skill ships no executable script of its own.

3 / 5

Workflow Clarity

The five-phase sequence and conditional shouldContinue branching are clearly laid out, but there are no validation checkpoints (e.g., verify search returned results, verify JSON parsed) in this batch/iterative workflow, which caps the score at 3 per the rubric.

3 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

Section headers provide reasonable structure, but no bundle files exist and everything (use cases, troubleshooting, output template) is inlined in a single long document rather than split into one-level-deep references.

3 / 5

Total

12

/

20

Passed

Description

83%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong description that clearly states capabilities, includes an explicit use-case trigger, and positions the skill relative to its web-search dependency. Slightly limited by narrow action coverage and missing common synonyms.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists several concrete actions — '多轮迭代的网络搜索', '综合分析', '智能搜索方向调整', '综合分析报告生成' — but coverage is narrow (all search/research), so it falls short of comprehensive.

4 / 5

Completeness

Explicitly states both what it does ('多轮迭代的网络搜索和综合分析') and when to use it via the concrete '使用场景:当用户需要…' trigger clause, satisfying both what and when.

5 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Contains natural user-facing phrases like '对特定主题进行深入、全面的研究' and '生成详细分析报告', giving good keyword coverage, though common synonyms (调研/文献综述/research) are mostly absent.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Occupies a clear deep-research niche and explicitly notes it '依赖web-search skill', delineating the boundary; minor overlap risk remains with the underlying web-search skill.

4 / 5

Total

17

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

referenced_paths_exist

Referenced path issues: 3 missing

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
huangruiteng/CS-Notes
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.