Content
72%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a lean, well-organized overview with genuinely executable commands and concrete thresholds, and the Python implementation is properly externalized to a real bundle script. Its main weakness is that the three commands are presented as isolated recipes rather than an explicit check → warn → reset loop with a validation checkpoint before recording history. Minor redundancy between the 阈值配置 and 重要原则 sections costs some token efficiency.
Suggestions
Add an explicit ordered workflow, e.g. '1. Each conversation: run check 2. On warning: execute /reset in the OpenClaw TUI 3. Then run reset to record the switch in history' — turning the three command recipes into a sequenced loop with a checkpoint.
Remove the duplicated threshold statement ('超过 3 个建议切换 session' appears in both 阈值配置 and 重要原则) and the restatement of the frontmatter description at the top of the body.
Document what the check/reset commands actually output so the user knows how to interpret warnings and confirm a reset was recorded.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is efficient — no explanation of concepts Claude already knows, just features, commands, thresholds, and constraints ('阈值配置', '状态文件', '重要原则'). It falls short of 5 because of redundancy: the threshold '超过 3 个建议切换 session' appears in both 阈值配置 and 重要原则, and '监控 OpenClaw session 状态，在需要时提醒用户切换 session' repeats the frontmatter description. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete, executable bash commands are given with the full script path ('cd /root/.openclaw/workspace/.../scripts/ && python3 session-optimizer.py check'), plus concrete numeric thresholds (2/3 tasks, 12/24 hours) and the state-file path — matching 'mostly executable guidance with minor gaps'. Not 5 because 'history' and 'reset' invocations rely on the cwd established by the first command block, and there is no guidance on interpreting the check output or what the reset flow actually does. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The three commands are documented but never sequenced into a workflow: there is no explicit 'run check each conversation → on warning use /reset in the TUI → run reset to record the switch' loop, and no validation/checkpoint step (e.g. verify the reset was performed before recording history). This matches the level-3 anchor 'steps listed but validation gaps; sequence present but checkpoints missing or implicit'. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The SKILL.md is a short, well-sectioned overview (核心功能 / 使用方法 / 阈值配置 / 状态文件 / 重要原则) with all implementation logic correctly externalized into scripts/session-optimizer.py, which exists and exposes exactly the documented check/history/reset commands — one level deep, clearly referenced via the command path. Per the simple-skill guidance, this merits a 5. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |