Content
72%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is highly actionable with executable commands and a well-structured, properly-referenced bundle script, but it repeats redundant principles and lacks an explicit validated workflow sequence. Tightening the principles section and adding a checkpoint after reset would lift it further.
Suggestions
Consolidate the redundant "重要原则" bullets into one or two statements (e.g. a single non-invasive principle) to remove near-duplicate phrasing.
Add an explicit reset workflow with a validation step, e.g. "1. run `check`; 2. if warned, run `reset`; 3. run `check` again to confirm state cleared."
Avoid restating the 3-task threshold in both 阈值配置 and 重要原则; reference the config section once.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is largely lean with concrete commands and thresholds, but the "重要原则" section repeats near-duplicate ideas ("不侵入内部代码", "不修改 OpenClaw 源代码", "不修改 OpenClaw 配置文件", "仅使用 OpenClaw 已提供的功能") and restates the 3-task threshold, so not every token earns its place. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides fully executable, copy-paste-ready commands with exact paths ("cd /root/.openclaw/.../scripts/ && python3 session-optimizer.py check") plus concrete thresholds and state-file path. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The check/history/reset commands are listed and clear, but there is no sequenced workflow with validation checkpoints or feedback loop (e.g. verifying state was cleared after reset), leaving checkpoints implicit. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines with well-organized sections and a single one-level-deep bundle reference (scripts/session-optimizer.py) that is a real file and correctly pathed in the body. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |