Content
67%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body delivers a genuinely actionable, well-sequenced read-only workflow with real validation checkpoints and correctly delegated script logic, and the referenced bundle files are real and match the documented flags. Its weaknesses are redundancy — the task-directory convention and suffix behavior stated multiple times, duplicated sections, orphaned comparison bullets — and minor forward-reference/path inconsistencies that hurt both conciseness and flow.
Suggestions
State the '.bensz-api/task-{...}/nsfc-ref-alignment/{...}/' directory convention and the '-2/-3' suffix behavior once (in 中间产物) and reference it from elsewhere instead of repeating it in 输出管理 and 公共硬约束.
Delete the orphaned '共同点/不同点' bullets at the end of 步骤 4 (they compare against an unnamed skill with no context) and merge the two '### 输入' sections into one.
Reconcile the run-directory notation: define '{run_dir}' before 步骤 3 uses it, and fix the 'run_{YYYYMMDDHHMMSS}' reference that does not appear in the actual path template.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body restates the '.bensz-api/task-...' directory convention three times (中间产物， 输出管理， 公共硬约束)， repeats the '-2/-3/...' timestamp-suffix note verbatim twice, has two '### 输入' sections, and ends step 4 with orphaned '共同点/不同点' bullets. It is mostly efficient but clearly could be tightened, matching anchor 3; not 4 because the redundancy goes beyond minor trimmable instances. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | The bash commands are concrete and executable (flags --project-root/--main-tex/--report-dir/--prepare/--verify-online match the actual bundled script), with concrete output filenames, path templates, and explicit P0/P1 judgment criteria. Minor gaps hold it at 4: the hardcoded 'cd /path/to/ChineseResearchLaTeX' environment assumption and '{run_dir}' being used in step 3 before it is defined. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | 步骤 1–4 are clearly sequenced with an explicit 校验 checklist (4 core artifacts present, no .tex/.bib modified, every P0/P1 has file/line + sentence + rationale + action) and a 失败与恢复 retry-from-last-failed-step loop, so the batch-operation cap does not apply. It falls short of anchor 5 due to structural incoherences: duplicate 输入 sections, the orphaned 共同点/不同点 bullets, and a 'run_{YYYYMMDDHHMMSS}' reference that does not match the path template actually shown. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is a well-sectioned overview that keeps script detail out of line and reaches it one level deep via the entry-point command 'scripts/run_ref_alignment.py' (the 6 bundled script files exist and are appropriately not inlined). It sits above the 'content that should be separate is inline' anchor but below 5 due to minor organization gaps from the duplicated sections. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |