Content
67%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-structured, actionable overview with a concrete runnable script, clear four-step workflow, validation checklist, and strict read-only modification boundaries. It is slightly verbose from repeated workspace-path definitions and would gain from an explicit validate→fix→retry loop and tighter deduplication.
Suggestions
Deduplicate the task-workspace path definition to a single canonical location and reference it elsewhere instead of restating it with varying formats.
Promote the static validation checklist into an explicit feedback loop inside the workflow (run script → check 4 artifacts exist → if missing, re-run with diagnostics).
Replace the placeholder cwd `/path/to/ChineseResearchLaTeX` with a parameterized or relative form so the command is copy-paste ready.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient and assumes Claude's LaTeX/BibTeX knowledge, but the task-workspace path is repeated across three sections in slightly varying formats and some explanatory prose could be tightened. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides a concrete, runnable bash command with real flags (--project-root, --prepare, --verify-online) and concrete input/output filenames, with the invoked script run_ref_alignment.py confirmed present in the bundle; the core semantic step is procedural (justifiably the host AI's job) and the command uses a placeholder cwd. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Four clearly sequenced steps plus a static self-check checklist and explicit destructive-guard modification boundaries; just short of 5 because the checklist is a static list rather than an explicit validate→fix→retry feedback loop embedded in the workflow. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized overview with the real script run_ref_alignment.py invoked by concrete one-level-deep command references and no nested pointer chains; could be 5 with explicit per-script reference links, but the structure is already clear and navigable. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |