Content
61%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, actionable body that delegates implementation to a bundled script, held back by path repetition and the absence of explicit validation feedback loops for a batch operation.
Suggestions
Add an explicit validation/verification checkpoint in the workflow (e.g. verify each figure produced a report section and that jpg conversion succeeded) with a fix→retry loop.
Define the hidden workspace path once and reference it by name afterward to remove the repeated verbatim path strings.
Document the full set of valid --runner values and their tradeoffs in one place rather than only noting --runner shell is disabled.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient and free of basic-concept padding, but the hidden workspace path ".bensz-api/task-{...}/paper-explain-figures/" is repeated verbatim across 目标, 强约束, 输出, 使用方式, and 清理方式, which could be tightened by defining it once. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete copy-paste commands ("python3 paper-explain-figures/scripts/paper_explain_figures.py --fig ... --note ...") with documented flags (--parallel, --max-parallel, --runner) and a full report template; minor gaps in covering every runner variant. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The sequence is laid out (convert to jpg, retrieve source code, three-source interpretation, report) but this batch/multi-figure operation lacks explicit validate→fix→retry feedback loops, capping workflow_clarity at 3 per the rubric. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Clear ## sections organize the overview and the bulk of logic is appropriately delegated to scripts/paper_explain_figures.py (a real bundle file referenced one level deep); minor gap is no separate advanced/reference doc, though not strictly required for a code-driven skill. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 14 / 20 Passed |