Content
65%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is well-structured and actionable with concrete commands and a clear taxonomy, but it rewrites the user's review.tex without an explicit validation/feedback loop and carries a broken config.yaml reference plus un-navigated helper scripts.
Suggestions
Add an explicit validation/feedback loop for the rewrite and render steps (e.g. 'After rewriting, re-check the citation still supports the sentence and confirm LaTeX still compiles; on render failure, fix and re-render') to lift workflow_clarity past the destructive/batch cap.
Remove or fix the 'config.yaml' reference (the file is not in the bundle) and either create it or point to the actual config location so the reference is not a dead end.
Briefly note the helper scripts in '参考与验证' (bib_utils.py, paragraph_analyzer.py, runtime_utils.py) so the bundle structure is discoverable one level deep from the overview.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and bullet-driven and assumes Claude's knowledge of LaTeX/BibTeX/PDF rendering; the only trims available are minor redundancy — '核心原则' repeats principles already in the description and '定位' overlaps the frontmatter — so it sits at 4 rather than 5. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete, copy-pasteable commands ('python3 scripts/run_ai_alignment.py --work-dir … --prepare/--render'), an explicit citation-problem taxonomy (fake_citation, wrong_citation, …), evidence-priority rules, and specific output file paths; minor gaps remain in placeholder paths and the under-specified ai_alignment_input.json schema ('至少包含…'). | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 6-step sequence is present, but this skill rewrites sentences across the user's existing *_review.tex (a destructive, batch-over-citations document modification) with no explicit validate→fix→retry feedback loop for the rewrite or render step, which caps workflow_clarity at 3 per the rubric's destructive/batch feedback-loop rule. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Sections are reasonably organized, but scored against the actual bundle the body references a non-existent 'config.yaml' (broken navigation) and only names the run_ai_alignment.py entry point while three real helper scripts (bib_utils.py, paragraph_analyzer.py, runtime_utils.py) are present but un-signaled — references are present but not cleanly verified against the bundle. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 14 / 20 Passed |