Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, actionable orchestration skill body with clear sequencing, validation checkpoints, and concrete file/ID/score contracts. It is efficient and appropriately references real bundle scripts, with only minor tightening and CLI-example gaps.
Suggestions
Add a one-line executable example or CLI usage for scripts/catalog.py (as is done for validate_layout.py) so the ID-generation/dedup path is copy-paste ready.
Trim the verbatim common-constraints block or summarize it, since the duplicated content competes with the context window without adding skill-specific value.
Provide a compact inline checklist or numbered sequence for the main flow so the multi-step pipeline reads as a single ordered workflow rather than scattered subsections.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient and assumes competence without teaching basics, though the duplicated common-constraints block and a few repeated boundary statements could be tightened. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete and specific — names scripts (catalog.py, validate_layout.py), exact catalog.jsonl fields, ID format, scoring dimensions, and hash-conflict rule — though exact CLI invocations for catalog.py are not shown. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear sequenced flow from catalog load through search-bundle consumption, hard-filter, scoring, quota fill, dedup, run output, to a 交付前确认 checklist, with explicit validation and failure/recovery checkpoints. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Body is well-structured with clear headers and inline, one-level-deep references to real bundle scripts at their points of use; only minor organization gaps since most detail lives inline rather than in separate reference files. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |