Content
73%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body delivers a well-sequenced, validation-rich pipeline with executable command examples and correctly referenced supporting files. Its main weakness is conciseness — repeated file listings and inlined generic constraint blocks inflate the token budget without adding skill-specific value.
Suggestions
Remove the duplicate references file listing (lines 162-167 repeat lines 50-55) and consolidate into a single 'Start by reading' section.
Move the '公共硬约束' block to a shared reference file and keep only skill-specific constraints inline, to reduce token cost and avoid repetition across skills.
Tighten abstract directives like '按文献综/述预算组织证据' into concrete, executable guidance (e.g., specify the budget CSV columns to read and how to allocate them).
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient operational directives, but the body is long, repeats the references file list twice (lines 50-55 and 162-167), and inlines sizable constraint blocks ('公共硬约束', 'Skill 专属约束') that could be tightened or externalized. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete, mostly copy-paste-ready CLI examples for the common entry points (run_pipeline.py, pipeline_runner.py with --prepare-only/--resume), with minor gaps where config.yaml keys are named but exact paths/defaults are not fully specified. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clearly sequenced pipeline (query generation → search → dedupe → scoring → selection → budget → writing → validation → export) with explicit fail-closed checkpoints and validation steps (validate_counts.py, validate_review_tex.py, generate_validation_report.py). | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Good structure with one-level-deep references to real files (all six referenced reference files exist), but several inline constraint sections duplicate material that reads as canonical common constraints rather than skill-specific overview. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |