research-literature-review
当用户明确要求"做系统综述/文献综述/related work/相关工作/文献调研"，或要求使用旧名 systematic-literature-review skill 时使用。AI 自定检索词，多源检索→去重→AI 逐篇阅读并评分（1–10分语义相关性与子主题分组）→按高分优先比例选文→自动生成"综/述"字数预算→资深领域专家自由写作（固定摘要/引言/子主题/讨论/展望/结论），保留正文字数与参考文献数硬校验，强制导出 PDF 与 Word。支持多语言翻译与智能编译（en/zh/ja/de/fr/es）。
68
83%
Does it follow best practices?
Run evals on this skill
Adds up to 20 points to the overall score
View guide
Low
Low-risk findings worth noting
Low
Low-risk findings.
1 low severity finding. Worth noting, but not necessarily harmful.
W011: Third-party content exposure detected (indirect prompt injection risk).
What this means
The skill exposes the agent to untrusted, user-generated content from public third-party sources, creating a risk of indirect prompt injection. This includes browsing arbitrary URLs, reading social media posts or forum comments, and analyzing content from unknown websites.
Why it was flagged
在 Required runtime 工作流“第 3 阶段 AI 评分与数据抽取”会逐篇读取由 OpenAlex 等检索源返回的标题与摘要（写入 `papers*.jsonl/scored_papers.jsonl`），而这些文本内容可能包含第三方（非本项目/非提供方）作者的自由文本，从而给出注入面。
- Repository
- huangwb8/ChineseResearchLaTeX
- Commit
f9a7f2c
- Audited
- Security analysis
Is this your skill?
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.