Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is an efficient, concrete redirect that delegates to an authoritative playbook with clear mechanics, but it relies entirely on external non-bundled files, leaving its progressive-disclosure structure unverifiable and the actionable substance absent from the skill itself.
Suggestions
Bundle the referenced playbook and rules files (or a condensed version) under references/ so the skill is self-contained and progressive disclosure can be verified.
Inline a brief summary of what the analysis produces so the body has actionable substance even if the playbook is unreachable.
Add a short validation/checklist step for the analysis output (e.g., confirm all named data sources are covered) to strengthen workflow clarity.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is a lean four-line redirect with no padding and no explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every token earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | It gives concrete, executable delegation — exact file paths and a named tool ('invoke .agents/agents/<name>.md via invoke_subagent') — but the actual analysis substance lives in an external, non-bundled playbook, leaving a minor gap. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear ordered sequence is present (read and execute the playbook, then follow cog.md, with a subagent substitution rule); no validation checkpoints are included, but the task is read-only analysis so the destructive/batch cap does not apply. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | References are signaled and one-level-deep, but they point to files outside the skill bundle (no references/scripts/assets directories exist), so the actual content split and navigation cannot be verified and internal structure is minimal. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |