Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is a well-structured, lean reference of project-specific conventions with concrete commands and an explicit drift-validation step. Its main limitation is the absence of any bundle/reference files and a fully spelled-out fix-and-retry loop for contract drift.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is tight and project-specific — bullet lists, tables, and concrete paths/commands with no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows (e.g. it never explains what CSRF or OpenAPI is), with only minor spots that could be trimmed further, keeping it just below a 5. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | It gives copy-paste-ready commands (`make generate-api`, the full `openapi-typescript ...` invocation, `./scripts/check-openapi-generated.sh`), concrete package paths, and an explicit endpoint table, with only minor gaps in coverage of less common cases. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The OpenAPI sync flow is sequenced (generate -> commit -> verify) with an explicit validation checkpoint (`check-openapi-generated.sh` fails if the SDK is stale); it stops short of a 5 because no explicit fix-and-retry recovery loop is documented. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is well-organized into clearly headed sections with content appropriately inlined for a conventions/reference skill; there are no bundle files and no signaled one-level-deep references, so it sits at 4 rather than 5. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |