Content
90%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a dense, high-signal rulebook: concrete placement tables, exact commands, explicit deviations from ideal architecture, and a workable decision procedure for new reads. It stays lean and project-specific throughout; the only weaknesses are the absence of validation checkpoints in its workflows and a modest opportunity to offload class inventories into reference files.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Every section carries project-specific facts Claude cannot know (module names, the domain→storage deviation, the @Column(length = 128) SSO rationale, the stale-artifact Maven trap) with no padding or explanations of general concepts, fitting 'lean and efficient; every token earns its place'. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | The code-type→module→package placement table, the exact 'make test-backend-app' / 'make test-backend' commands with an explicit 'Never run' anti-pattern, and the 4-step decision procedure for new read use cases are all directly executable guidance, fitting 'fully executable; copy-paste ready'. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The read-use-case decision sequence is clearly ordered and the test section explains a concrete failure mode and its correction, but there are no explicit validation checkpoints after placement or dependency changes — 'clear sequence with most checkpoints present; minor validation gaps' rather than 5. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Sections are well organized with no dead references and no content that clearly belongs in a separate file, but at ~104 inline lines with inventories (six deviating domain services, four query-repository pairs) that could move to a reference file, it fits 'good structure; most content appropriately placed; minor organization gaps' rather than the fully split level 5. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |