Content
82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
An actionable, well-structured scanning workflow with executable commands and a real, clearly-signaled bundled reference. Conciseness and workflow clarity are strong but have minor room to tighten.
Suggestions
Trim the product-packaging disambiguation sentences to the minimum needed to avoid confusion with hol-guard.
Consider an explicit validation/exit-state checkpoint after the scan (e.g. 'if the scan errors, re-run with --format json to inspect') to strengthen the workflow feedback loop.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and mostly efficient with no padding of concepts Claude already knows; only minor product-disambiguation prose ('intentionally packaged separately from the hol-guard runtime CLI') could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides copy-paste-ready executable commands with real flags across scan, lint, and verify covering the common cases, e.g. 'plugin-scanner scan PATH --config "$TRUSTED_SCANNER_CONFIG" --profile strict-security --format markdown'. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear four-step sequence with a readiness check in step 1 and structured interpretation in step 4; no validate→fix→retry loop, but scanning is read-only so the destructive-cap does not apply. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-sectioned body with a single one-level-deep reference (references/trusted-scanner.toml, confirmed present and clearly signaled via absolute-path resolution); minor organization gaps keep it just below a 5. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |