Content
85%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
An actionable, well-structured conventions skill with concrete commands, a validation checklist, and clean section organization. The main weakness is a redundant re-listing of commit types that slightly undercuts conciseness.
Suggestions
Remove the duplicated Types list under 'Commit Message Format' and replace it with a reference to the PR-title types table, since it already states 'Same convention as PR titles'.
Add a brief feedback loop for checklist failures (e.g., 'If a check fails, fix the issue and re-run the failing command before opening the PR') to strengthen workflow clarity.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly lean with no concept tutorials, but 'Commit Message Format' redundantly re-lists the same Types already shown in the PR-title table, which could be tightened to a single reference. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Concrete, copy-paste-ready commands (`make test-backend-app`, `make typecheck-web`, `make generate-api`, `make staging`) plus specific PR-title/commit examples and a structured PR body template. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 4-step workflow sequence paired with an explicit validation checklist (tests pass, typecheck passes, smoke test passes) provides the checkpoints the score-3 anchor requires. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | A single self-contained conventions skill with no external references needed, organized into six clearly-headed sections; per the simple-skills note, well-organized sections suffice. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |