Content
50%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This skill provides a comprehensive design token reference with clear constraint language (MUST/SHOULD/NEVER), but it reads more like a raw design audit dump than an actionable skill. It lacks executable code examples showing how to implement these tokens in practice, and some values appear suspicious (e.g., 0px input height, #F5261E red as page background for a 'light mode' system, 91px heading size, 40px body text). The content would benefit from consolidation, implementation examples, and splitting detailed references into separate files.
Suggestions
Add concrete code examples (CSS/Tailwind/React components) showing how to implement the design tokens — e.g., a styled button, card, or input component using the specified values.
Review and fix suspicious values: 0px input height, bright red (#F5261E) as page background for a 'light mode' system, and 91px/40px as heading/body sizes seem like extraction errors.
Split the detailed typography reference table and component specifications into separate reference files (e.g., TYPOGRAPHY.md, COMPONENTS.md) and link to them from the main skill.
Add a quick-start section showing a minimal implementation example that demonstrates the core design system (colors, typography, spacing) applied together.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The content is reasonably structured but includes excessive detail that may not earn its tokens — e.g., the full typography reference with 10+ text styles and their counts, detected layout patterns with pixel-exact dimensions, and redundant border radius sections. The semantic token table and text styles table could be consolidated. However, it avoids explaining basic concepts Claude already knows. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | The skill provides specific values (hex codes, pixel sizes, font weights) and clear MUST/SHOULD/NEVER constraints, which is good. However, it lacks executable code examples — no CSS snippets, no Tailwind classes, no component code. For a UI design system skill, concrete implementation examples (e.g., a button component, a card layout) would significantly improve actionability. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The skill is primarily a reference document rather than a multi-step workflow, so workflow clarity is less critical. However, there's no guidance on the order of applying these constraints when building a UI, no validation steps (e.g., checking contrast ratios), and no feedback loops for verifying the design system is correctly applied. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The content is organized into clear sections with headers and tables, which aids navigation. However, at ~150+ lines it's quite long for a single file — the detailed typography reference, text styles table, and component specifications could be split into separate reference files. There are no cross-references to external files for deeper detail. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 8 / 12 Passed |