Content
50%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This skill provides a structured design system reference with clear semantic tokens, typography specs, and interaction guidelines using a helpful MUST/SHOULD/NEVER constraint hierarchy. However, it appears to contain raw extraction artifacts (0px input heights, inconsistent element widths, redundant typography references) that undermine credibility, and lacks executable code examples showing implementation in actual CSS/Tailwind/component code. The content would benefit from curation to remove suspicious values and addition of implementation snippets.
Suggestions
Add executable code examples showing implementation (e.g., Tailwind config with custom theme values, CSS custom properties block, or a sample component using the design tokens)
Review and remove apparent extraction artifacts: '0px' input height, inconsistent 'element widths: 15px, 67px, 13px, 16px, 17px', and duplicate body-secondary entries with slightly different specs
Move detailed reference tables (full text styles, all font sizes, border radius scale) into a separate REFERENCE.md file and link to it from the main skill
Add a brief workflow section explaining the order of application (e.g., 'Apply layout constraints first, then typography, then color tokens') to guide implementation sequence
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The content is mostly efficient with well-structured tables and clear MUST/SHOULD/NEVER constraints, but includes some redundant information (e.g., the Typography Reference section repeats font sizes already shown in the table, 'Count' column with all 1s adds no value, and some detected values like '0px input height' seem like artifacts rather than intentional design specs). | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides concrete design tokens, specific values, and clear constraints (MUST/SHOULD/NEVER), which is actionable for a design system skill. However, there are no code examples showing how to implement these values (e.g., Tailwind config, CSS custom properties, or component snippets), and some specs seem like raw extraction artifacts (e.g., '0px height for input fields', inconsistent element widths like '15px, 67px, 13px') rather than curated, executable guidance. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | For a design system reference skill, the sections are logically organized and the MUST/SHOULD/NEVER hierarchy provides clear priority. However, there's no workflow for how to apply these guidelines (e.g., 'start with layout, then typography, then colors') and no validation steps to verify compliance with the design system. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The content is well-sectioned with clear headings and tables, making it scannable. However, at ~150 lines with detailed reference tables, some content (like the full text styles table or border radius reference) could be split into separate reference files, and there are no cross-references to external files for deeper detail. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 8 / 12 Passed |